Electrifying Showdown: Anker 737 Surpasses Shargeek Storm 2 in Power Bank Duel
In today’s fast-paced world, people rely on more than just mobile phones to stay connected. Laptops, drones, cameras, and other mobile devices have become essential companions, demanding reliable power sources, especially when on the go. This growing need has led to the rise of high-output power banks that can handle the charging requirements of multiple devices. In this blog post, we will delve into the Power Bank Showdown, comparing two prominent contenders in the market: Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2.
The Anker 737 Power Bank and the Shargeek Storm 2 are both powerhouses when it comes to charging capabilities. They offer high output power, making them ideal for outdoor adventures, remote work, or any situation where access to traditional power sources is limited. These power banks provide the convenience and peace of mind that your devices will remain powered up when you need them most.
In this detailed comparison, we will explore the key features, performance, and compatibility of the Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2. We’ll assess their battery capacities, charging technologies, and user-friendly functionalities. Additionally, we’ll consider factors like design, portability, and overall user experience to help you make an informed decision.
Anker 737
Battery Capacity: 24,000mAh
Port: 3 Port(2 USB-C & 1 USB-A)
Max Ouput: 140W
Weight: 22.22 oz/630 g
Shargeek Storm 2
Battery Capacity: 25,600mAh
Port: 4 Port(2 USB-C & 1 USB-A & 1*DC)
Max Ouput: 100W
Weight: 20.86 oz/591.3 g
Table of Contents
What's Included?
Anker 737
- Anker 737 Power Bank*1
- Charging Cable*1
- Packaging Bag*1
- User Manual Pack*1(User Manual, Quick Guide)
Shargeek Storm 2
- Shargeek Storm 2 Power Bank*1
- Charging Cable*1
- Packaging Bag*1
- User Manual *1
Design
Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2 power banks offer distinct visual aesthetics. The Anker 737 adopts a sophisticated business style with its sleek, grey, and silver color scheme, reflecting a professional and refined appearance.
On the other hand, the Shargeek Storm 2 showcases a unique cyberpunk-inspired design with its see-through case, allowing users to witness the internal circuits and components. This transparent feature sets the Shargeek Storm 2 apart from other power banks on the market, creating a visually striking and futuristic look.
Whether you prefer the elegance of the Anker 737 or the standout cyberpunk design of the Shargeek Storm 2, both power banks offer distinctive styles that cater to different user preferences.
Battery Capacity
Both Anker 737 and Shargeek Storm 2 power banks offer impressive power reserves. The Anker 737 boasts a substantial 24,000mAh battery capacity, providing ample juice to keep your devices charged throughout the day. With this capacity, you can expect multiple charges for smartphones, tablets, and other smaller devices.
On the other hand, the Shargeek Storm 2 takes it a step further with a massive 25,600mAh battery capacity, offering even more power for extended usage. With this additional capacity, you can expect extended charging capabilities, making it an excellent choice for longer trips or situations where access to traditional power sources may be limited. Whether you opt for the Anker 737’s 24,000mAh or the Shargeek Storm 2’s 25,600mAh, both power banks provide substantial battery capacities to keep your devices powered up when you need them most.
Max Output
Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2 power banks offer impressive charging capabilities. The Shargeek Storm 2 features a PD 100W USB C port, allowing for fast charging of devices like the MacBook Pro 16″. With the included 100W USB C cable and charger, it can charge the MacBook Pro 16″ from 0% to 50% in just 41 minutes, which is twice as fast as the original charger, saving you valuable time. On the other hand, the Anker 737 takes it a step further with its 140W fast charging capability. This means it can charge a MacBook Pro 16″ to 50% in a slightly shorter time frame, approximately 40 minutes. Whether you choose the Shargeek Storm 2’s PD 100W fast charging or the Anker 737’s 140W fast charging, both power banks offer high-output capabilities to keep your devices charged quickly and efficiently.
Port
Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2 power banks offer versatile connectivity options. The Shargeek Storm 2 boasts an impressive array of ports, including two USB C ports, one USB port, and an adjustable DC port. This diverse selection allows for simultaneous charging of multiple devices, including laptops, smartphones, tablets, and more. The inclusion of an adjustable DC port further enhances compatibility with a wide range of devices. On the other hand, the Anker 737 offers two USB C ports and one USB port, catering to the charging needs of various devices. While it may have one less port compared to the Shargeek Storm 2, the Anker 737 still provides ample connectivity options for charging multiple devices simultaneously. Whether you prioritize the Shargeek Storm 2’s extensive port selection or the Anker 737’s reliable and versatile port arrangement, both power banks offer the convenience and flexibility needed for on-the-go charging.
Weight
There is a slight difference between the Shargeek Storm 2 and the Anker 737 power banks. The Shargeek Storm 2 weighs in at 590g, making it slightly lighter compared to the Anker 737, which weighs 630g. While the Shargeek Storm 2 is marginally lighter, the disparity in weight is not substantial enough to make a significant impact on portability or ease of carrying. Both power banks maintain a relatively compact and manageable weight, ensuring they can be easily taken on the go without causing any inconvenience. Whether you opt for the slightly lighter Shargeek Storm 2 or the Anker 737, the difference in weight is minimal and should not greatly affect your decision-making process.
Price
There is a difference between the Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2 power banks. The Anker 737 is priced at $159.99 on its official website, offering a competitive and affordable option for those seeking a high-capacity power bank with fast charging capabilities. On the other hand, the Shargeek Storm 2 is priced slightly higher at $229 on its official website. While it may have a higher price tag, the Shargeek Storm 2 justifies its cost with its unique see-through design, PD 100W fast charging, and comprehensive port selection. Ultimately, the choice between the Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2 may come down to personal preferences, budget considerations, and the specific features that best align with your charging needs.
Conclusion
In the battle of high-output power banks, the Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2 have proven to be formidable contenders, each with their own strengths and unique features.
The Anker 737 impresses with its sleek design, reliable performance, and versatile charging capabilities. With its 24,000mAh battery capacity and 140W fast charging, it offers ample power for multiple device charges, including laptops and smartphones. The smart digital display adds convenience and enhances the user experience.
On the other hand, the Shargeek Storm 2 stands out with its cyberpunk-inspired see-through design, making it a visual standout among power banks. Its 25,600mAh battery capacity, PD 100W fast charging, and comprehensive port selection make it an excellent choice for those with diverse charging needs.
When making a decision between these power banks, it is essential to consider individual preferences, charging requirements, and budget. The Anker 737 provides reliable performance and versatility at a competitive price of $159.99. Meanwhile, the Shargeek Storm 2 offers a unique design, PD 100W fast charging, and an array of ports at a slightly higher price of $229.
Ultimately, whether you prioritize sleek design, reliability, or unique features, both the Anker 737 and the Shargeek Storm 2 offer solid options for high-output power banks. Whichever power bank you choose, you can rest assured that you’ll have a reliable and powerful companion to keep your devices charged and ready for any adventure.